Many will, and knowledge will increase

Sunday, July 30, 2017

THE IMPORTANCE OF ILLUSION


by Mario Sales


Maya (hinduism tradition) has always been defined as a problem to be solved, not as a condition to be understood, contextualized, capable of having a meaning and reason for being, within the dynamics of existence.
I have spoken several times about the importance of illusion, the fundamental role of Malkuth (cabalistic tradition), that the view that here is hell and that paradise is out of here is a misconception.
Maya is an illusion, yes, but it is also a laboratory of evolution.
Without illusion there is no evolution.
It is.

Thursday, January 7, 2016

THE MYSTICISM PRACTICE AND MENTAL HEALTH


by Mario Sales, FRC, SI, MM 18o 




A recurring theme in discussions about the mystical atmosphere today is the mental quality of mystical schools members.
Maybe it has a particular gravity and importance for the history of occult practice that gathered strongly impressionable people with charlatans handlers, usually aware of their ability to induce the weak of mind in unethical conduct under the most disparate reasons, which included consumption drugs and orgies practices on the grounds of seeking higher states of consciousness.
I'm not a moralist, do not misunderstand me. I studied for my intellectual formation Greek civilization where the behavioral values ​​scale is in many light years different from the values ​​of the Judeo Christian culture (see the book Paideia, Werner Jaeger).
It is clear, however, that humans are not as complex as well in their behaviors, even occult, that in most cases, are less esoteric and more human ("too human ...") than would like to admit .
And if through technical primary hypnotic induction and suggestion, induced unprepared minds to satisfy their lust or financially support their materials whims did not do so by the pursuit of holiness and just could not reach a particular level of perception, but only and only using people as they use objects for his own enjoyment.
And only they could find a fertile mind and abundant material around them.
As Nietzsche asked, we should also ask whether the guilt of a crime is the criminal strength or weakness of the victim.
Esoteric environments, with their candles, their incense, their dark speeches, subject to the most varied and disparate interpretations, can induce minds less elaborate to error, superstition and fantasy.
And here, as I am an admirer of Spinoza, I would do it again an important distinction between fantasy and imagination. For Espinosa, both were one and the same. The time, however, passed, and the language and concepts, are improved.
Today, therefore, while imagination is considered a positive quality, the basis of artistic creativity and scientific fantasy can, on occasion, be just and only a delusion, an escape from an undesirable everyday reality in order to plunge the individual in a link loss condition with the objective world.
In Rosicrucian practice at the time of Spencer and Ralph Lewis, there was great emphasis on maintaining appropriate separation between fantasy and mysticism mysticism goal. Mental techniques (that was what we called) were methods that could be checked, tested and repeated by any person who wished to do. There was an appeal to obscure methods, tongues or complex pantomimes as in the eighteenth century, or as in the time of John Dee, in the century. XV. No. The Rosicrucian technique, strongly anchored in the use of mental creative visualization and imagination, managed to practice mystical minimalist profile, clear, objective and practical, secure the psychological and psychiatric point of view, as revolutionary as only advanced and pragmatic minds as Spencer Lewis could elaborate.
And part of this effort to remove the "occult mud" from the top of mysticism light was the result of history of mental problems from improper practices made by people emotionally unprepared to deal with situations unorthodox, to say the simplest way possible.
These serious esoteric schools, looking by all means avoid this still frequent misunderstanding which sees identity between mysticism and bizarre practices, esoteric and exotic, so that people who participate in these schools can benefit if their affiliation and not, rather, be victims of them.
Why AMORC has so carefully (at times excessive) with the cult of personality between members. So there is intermittent concern to maintain control over the nature of the practices and lectures within affiliate bodies. In Freemasonry, much less mystical and esoteric that the Rosicrucian, this concern does not exist since there is much less attraction to the mystery.
Spirituality in Freemasonry does not have mystical character, but religious. And this is understandable.
The mystical bias is extremely complex, requires the assumption of a series of psychological assumptions, like changing look of the place of the Sacred, whether it is or is not separate from us; on Divine Omnipresence be just a concept or a reality; and understanding of the Emerald Tablet, which says "What's up is down" and then continues "and what is down is up." Religious watch the first part of the sentence and mystics in the second.
Masons are more religious. They think that there is a God, that He is the Creator of all things.
Mystical Rosicrucians are or seek to be the manifest God himself, experiencing this union every second of his life. They do not stop your chores to pray. They are constantly in prayer and communion, even in the midst of his worldly obligations.
But back to the topic.
We must be careful with our Fraters and Sorores, a parent care for child. Certain esoteric information is hidden for a simple reason: not all understand its meaning and could inadvertently give you a sense non-existent, unrealistic, pathological psychiatrically.
One example is the deal with being invisible most of the times. What I do not see, or can not be there where I think it is. The more prudent not to worry about it unless, by his own will, these beings want to become visible. And believe me, it is then that it is important to have a balanced mind. Such views are often not very quiet experience. No wonder the first sentence of any angel, in the biblical text, to become visible to a prophet was "Fear not."
Because of this, the most important lesson I got from my teacher was that the esoteric mystical practice can not do without common sense and objectivity. At the time he received this teaching, I lived still walking in the clouds, dreaming of paranormal powers, fascinated by everything that could have at least an esoteric appearance. Paid no attention to the need for evidence, the fantastic claims that gathered from a wide variety of books, especially those of Eliphas Levi.
After I received this guidance, the way the teachers like to do them, as a mental suggestion, my view of mystical practice has changed dramatically. From there, I began to look much more beautiful texts without any evidence base, as just very beautiful texts, but not aware of fundamentals.
Not that with this I will tachasse of balelas, but enjoyed them, which later came to know as phenomenological technique, leaving them in quotes, without establishing on them any value judgment.
What once I read as sources of facts, now were symbolic texts that mattered for their beauty and not by his statements are expressions of actual facts.
The first and most striking change is that my anxiety disappeared by the manifestation of special gifts such as telepathy, telekinesis, etc. I started to pay more attention in everyday life, in the simplest events, the voice of the people in contact with friends and society.
If these gifts were to be developed, they would naturally, within the context of an ordinary life, when God Almighty judge, in his infinite wisdom and knowledge, it was the appropriate time for this.
Free from this anxiety, the gifts began to manifest. I felt up my intuitive ability, I began to see in me the ability to read minds, nothing that resembled the film telepaths, but enough for me to take the most correct conclusions about the people I have been associated. Discovered and began to verbalize lectures on the concept that the manifestation of esoteric gifts does not happen with background music or incidental sounds, but the most banal situations, in a supermarket, in a fair, or taking a shower.
The ability to fantasize wildly of certain people is so great, some times, arriving to suppose that mystical phenomena manifest it always cinematic and grand way. I found that none of this is real. Life is simple and the gifts are manifested simply as breathing or the sound. Pass naturally part of our senses without feeling anything special for it.
What my teacher had taught me was that life was bare bones, and though art sought to beautify existence, the beauty of life was already in itself, without any increase, with nothing to withdraw.
Only by harmonizing with reality, with daily life, we can contemplate this beauty I speak of.
Pay close attention to events is the secret. Pay attention to all the facts parading before us.
People with uncontrolled mind, fanciful, distort reality all the time, and some times seem to be blind to obvious things. The esotericism can not and should not be an aggravating this situation.
So I argued in an old essay, Psychology and Mysticism, today one of the most accessed from the blog, that all who wished to practice mysticism should be aware of their mental health, and if necessary, resort to the good offices of a psychologist or even a psychiatrist, intending to organize your mind and your thoughts. I did not want to it to say that these people suffer from a mental disorder, a priori, but they should be mindful of the fact that the more blurry the glass, the less light will be able to cross it, and the mind is our lens , our glass, through which light comes to us God.
A mind not sick, but only immature, also needs proper education before entering the mystical means. This will ensure that enjoy the knowledge of millennia and the esoteric tradition of much more richly and more objectively.
Yes, goal. We, as always say, people who deal with subjectivity, we must be very objective and when we look at the sky our feet must be placed firmly on the ground below us, so that the infinite insight into our head does not cause the dizziness.
Not practiced mysticism to worsen our mental condition, but rather to improve as people.
And improved in direct proportion to the development of common sense, moderation and increasing our culture.
In the Middle It is said that when we receive a visitor, this should be treated as its Shiva, is this the visit.
Imagine then if Shiva in person visiting our mind. This must be properly arranged to receive Him in all His splendor, in all His glory.
Behold the light without the proper training can be maddening and so it is good that we do so gradually.
This is, and always has been the strategy of prudence.
Mental health is a precious asset that must be preserved with the same care with which preserves physical health. We take care so that within our Order, to recognize a brother who needs more development and maturity, we know advise you to seek, if necessary, professional assistance, preventing noble and holy practices may be responsible for poor quality of their lives .

Sunday, January 3, 2016

CONSIDERATIONS MYSTICAL : THE THREE THEOLOGICAL VIRTUES.

The Three Theological Virtues APOSTLE PAUL: THE VISION MYSTIC

by Mario Sales, FRC, SI, MM



If we list the problems of Western Mysticism to evolve, in speech and penetration of hearts and minds, the worst of all the obstacles may be the lack of clear distinction between the mystical discourse and religious discourse.
For many years, in the absence of a competent and thorough review, the text that supports the ideologically Mysticism in its most varied manifestations, is made up of a patchwork quilt made up of sacred texts of different religions created by the human sensitivity , on which the mystical vision casts his original interpretation, extracting the meanings of these texts concerning him.
Still, in many cases, the mystical text is just the repetition of the words of the Enlightened these texts, placed strategically in other texts, in the form of quotes should thus support the realization of an idea.
In other words, when we talk about the importance of charity or ethical conduct, we used speeches of Christ; if we want to talk about detachment, use quotes the Buddha or other spiritual leaders.
It is assumed that by using these speeches ready, we are being sufficiently supported by the word of the authorities in this field (the mystical field) and therefore our thesis will be better grounded.
There is, however, a conceptual problem in this strategy: their ingenuity. By basing his ideas on religious speech, the mystics are in danger of confusing the two speeches and having to defend values ​​that are not yours.
Maybe that's why it is very common for ideas strength of spiritualism and the Catholic Church constantly penetrating the discourse of mystical schools as AMORC, as if they were identical, sufficient and satisfactory to explain what mysticism advocates.
Ledo mistake.
There is perhaps most original vision of the religious notion that mystical vision.
Mysticism is not religion, it is an absolutely different understanding of the world as we see it. Is in relation to religious discourse in proportion to the scientific discourse is the discourse of common sense.
For example, to religion there must be a prophet, mysticism each is his own prophet.
If religion need is the belief in a personal God, spatially located in the mystical vision God is an amorphous, decentralized phenomenon, pantheistic, truly ubiquitous.
If, finally, to religion, Death issue of discussion is fundamental and Life beyond Life, the mystic replies that there is no death, but transition and that there are two kinds of life, but only one kind of life.
Ie thinking is mystically change values ​​that go beyond mere intellectual information. It must change the way of thinking and, I admit, the esoteric schools have enormous difficulty of dealing with this problem.
The limitation is not only spiritual, but also philosophical.
When mysticism speaks of an omnipresent God, man tries to represent him by Orthodox Christian model of a bearded old man seated on a throne of the Apocalypse of John the Evangelist. This being so, spatially located, the representation of a naive mind the philosophical point of view, will have great powers, and so it will be Omnipresent.
At no point going through the mind of this neophyte thought to represent an omnipresent God as present in any place, at any time, it is a logical nonsense.
No matter the concept that we work. The image that we use to represent it in our mind denounce understanding or not this same concept.
And like mysticism works with very advanced concepts in relation to religions, we need to maintain power and to facilitate access of the masses to their speeches Manichean images, simple, palatable, easily digestible, it generates a conflict in most cases intuited but not understood much less expressed.
This is cancer of the Mystical Education. The lack of clarity about its fundamental elements, on the lines of its contour on their basics, their ideas about power.
The mystic speech, eager to be didactic, makes concessions to the lack of clarity and the speeches of other lines of thought, not mystical, but religious, in an attempt to attract the understanding of their new members from other doctrines and other lines of thought.
Supposes, again naively, that should be left to the heart of each one, understand what's deep, mysterious, so mystic, under the religious discourse in his times of their particular understanding, not realizing that the offer the mystical neophyte an incomplete speech and unclear, it only delays this understanding it would be much faster if, at first, was put that to enter the world of mystical understanding is necessary to avoid the values ​​of understanding and that's what the job alchemical initiate must concentrate.
This also takes time, but unlike the other case, has a direction, a compass, a focus in which focus.
I have no doubt that we have removed many individuals of modern mysticism is not only the immediacy of our day, but this philosophical uncertainty that permeates our teaching, and that confuses with a New Religion.
Not official, basic texts, prepared with care, but the interpretations made by people who should represent the world's mystical thought.
For example, I would like to mention an important piece of religious discourse which has been assumed to be mystical, proving my thesis that lack any kind of philosophical filter in transliteration values ​​between these areas.
It is known to all the concept of "Theological Virtues," which we find in Paul the Evangelist.
Is the Letter to the Corinthians, 1, ch. 13:
"Now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity. "
The mystical discourse often incorporates these as their values ​​without critical or explanatory care.
Then do a mystical analysis of these three virtues and see how would after filtering the values ​​they preach.

The Faith



Faith is considered mostly as a mystic virtue, but this is not true. When I say I have faith in something, I mean that I believe without proof, without anything to give me support my belief. It is a delivery phenomenon, a bet shall we say, a conviction that springs from the intimate or an educational conditioning, doctrinal thus acquired, that something is one way, regardless of facts that support this conviction.
But the mystical works with other value, the confidence. He trusts things experienced in the style of orthodox scientist, but in a more subtle perceptual field. It is the nature of the mystical search yourself and not what is outside it.
Therefore, when the mystics claim to believe in some things, mean that they know that they are so because they have experienced personal and intimate way the perception of these convictions. Their belief stems from an indoor experiment, an experience, not a convincing done from outside to inside. The classic example is the sunrise. The mystic has no faith in the fact that the sun will rise, but know that it will, as experienced this phenomenon many times. And its repeated experience, draws its confidence that this phenomenon will repeat itself, respecting its cyclical character.
Faith is an unfounded belief. Trust is a reasoned belief. Who has faith believes what he does not know if it's real. Who relies on the other hand, believes in things he knows are the way they are.


The Hope


"Hope generates belief and then the search. That hope is despair of the product - the despair of all those around us in this world. Despair is born Hope - (...) two sides of the same coin. When there is no hope, there is hell, and the fear of hell gives us the vitality of hope. "[1]
"Happy To live is to live without hope. The man who gave hope, is not a happy man; he knows despair. The state of hopelessness 'projects' hope or resentment, despair or happy future.
We're free of hope when we are happy. It is when we are unhappy, sick, oppressed, exploited, that's when tomorrow becomes important "[2].
It is with these considerations Krishnamurti who want to start my discussion of this word, this force idea of ​​religion, which some mystics take as his own.
The krishnamurtiana view is very useful to report this game of mirrors that words like hope creates in us. Manifestation of anxiety and not of spirituality, the term defines a passive state waiting for something we want to happen, without specifying any action for such a thing to occur. It is the version of everyday, mundane life, to the concept expressed in the word faith, the relationship with the Divine.
It is an unfounded belief that something will happen unless we take no action for this to occur, as if the facts were separated from us, as if the karma does not exist.
There are causes and consequences of these causes, it knows no mystic. Hope is a concept devoid of this understanding. It is hoped by some independent thing of any causes that have generated. This is just one of the manifestations of anxiety, the other face of despair, as well remember Krishnamurti.
Rather, the mystic does not live in the future, not waiting for the next, but delves into the eternal present, preparing and modifying the future in the now, in action, the transformation brought about by words, thoughts, actions and views of what you want.
The mystic has no hope, but awareness of here - now that the fence and know that there is no future without the present and the very notion of time is a con itself.
And all that is born of an error, error is also, according to a principle of logic support.
So mystics have no hope or may have, as they are beings aware of their role as transforming forces and its connection with everything around. His life, he knows what he will decide in your mind and in your heart, these convictions that will shape their actions and behaviors.
God is within every mystic. Therefore it must believe in themselves, in what is within themselves, not something distant for which we must passively wait.
Tomorrow is now. There is no future. Surely none of us has any future. Only the eternal present.

The Charity


Finally, we question the charity. Because sung in prose verse, it is important as an evaluation criterion of the degree of goodness of heart.
What is however Charity, Paul considers the most important of the three virtues? It is the act of giving to those in need, again and again, becoming "a river flowing to those who need" [3].
The Concise Oxford Dictionary, 2009, Ed aims says
Charity is: 1.virtude theological leading to love
God and our neighbor; 2 Derivation: by metonymy .: act by which benefits others, esp. the poor and the powerless (emphasis added); 3.disposição favorable toward someone at a disadvantage (physical, moral, social etc.); compassion, kindness, mercy.

By definition, be Charitable is to be good with someone weaker, inferior, and therefore, it is assumed in need.
The giver of charity, gives because he sees the other as inferior to him. This, amazingly, is not a typical mystical vision.

Such a statement, which will seem surprising to many, intoxicated by the theoretical confusion between mysticism and religion, rests on a holy book, not the Bible or the Koran, but the Bhagavad Gita, which says in chapter 5, verse 18:


"The humble sages, by virtue of true knowledge, see with the same vision a learned and courteous brahmana, a cow, an elephant, a dog and a dog-eater (outcaste)."

Now, if we substitute the word "lowly wise" for the word "mystical" we will have a correct idea of ​​the mystical vision of doing good.
When the mystical help someone does not do it for charity, since at no time see that it helps to be less than it is material or spiritual.
What the mystic does, why do so must do, since you see that it assists an extension of themselves, not someone different from him. His attitude is one of solidarity with an equal and not charity be with a different and inferior to him.
To the mystic, given to his knowledge, there can be no people below, or abandoned. All human beings are children of God like himself, all have within themselves the same divine spark, the same force and only apparently are in a state of suffering, this is due to their limited understanding of their own power inside and not because they really are weakened.
So in no time a mystical help a needy out of pity, but because it is his duty as a member of the human race, which he needed part, on equal terms, while not apparent that. Let's say he has no mercy pity that that helps.
This is an extremely different way to understand the act of kindness, not as a concession from someone in a better position to one that does not have them, but someone who shares with one who assists the blessings God has given us to be shared with our brothers.
Mystics do not give things because they are good people; share with those who help only what they have to manage and distribute and that at no time think it's yours. Are flow channels from the Source of all things and not sources itself. This is Solidarity. An action between brothers, between equals. This makes the escape of a grave sin: pride, as it follows the letter said that the right hand should not know what the left does. They act in silence and in secrecy to avoid the sin of pride, or the discomfort that causes someone to feel indebted to another, unable to reciprocate.
In this way, faith religious expression, Hope and Charity, the mystical point of view would be replaced by trust, awareness and solidarity, without prejudice to the action itself, but with great profit in the transmission of genuinely mystical values ​​over others taken by Loan religious discourse.
This is just one example of how we could be more careful in the direction of those who seek the gates of mysticism, that could delay as I said, unnecessarily, their spiritual evolution.
[1] Krishnamurti, "The light is not quenched" Pag. 17 to 20 - published by ICK
[2] Krishnamurti, The True Purpose Of Life - pp. 92-94 - Edit. Cultrix
[3] Anthony Quinn, through the mouth of his character, Auda abu Tayi, the film Lawrence of Arabia with Peter O'Toole in the title role, 1962, directed by David Lean